Essay Detailed Project Proposal and Initial Literature Review – Management Assignment Help

Assignment Task:

Task:

Module Summary

The final year project is the culmination of your degree programme. It allows you to work on a substantial problem in Computer Science, Computing, Ethical Hacking, Games Technology, Multimedia or Business Information Technology for an extended period of time. It allows you to demonstrate your competence as a computing professional, and to apply what you have learnt in the other components of your degree.
This module tests your ability to:
Propose a suitable research question or practical computing related problem
Carry out a substantial problem-solving task of your own choosing
Work independently to prioritize the different components of your project, as well as balancing the project, as a whole, against other work;Take decisions, and to justify them convincingly.
It is your responsibility to lead your project, to attend your supervision meetings and to ask for the advice that you need. The project is an opportunity to demonstrate problem solving skills. It must include a substantial piece of primary research.
The project can be in any area of Computing including Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, Software Engineering, Business Process Improvement, Data Mining, Cloud Computing, Database theory, Computational Theory, Human-Computer Interaction, Usability, Mobile Development, Security, Web Application Development, game development or Multimedia.
The project will NOT consist of only a literature review, nor will a secondary research summary be deemed sufficient to meet the learning outcomes.
All projects must embed a significant piece of primary research and you will be asked to define a research question at the start of the project and develop a plan to evaluate your primary research to develop a solution. During the project you will need to evaluate alternative approaches and solutions to problems. It is important that you document these decisions as they should form a substantial part of your Project Report.
Peter Every. September 2019
Learning Outcomes

• On completion of this module a student should be able to:
• Apply intellectual rigour to a topic area or subject that is of interest to the student and relevant to the programme of study undertaken at a Bachelor’s level.
• Conceptualise, articulate and communicate a particular area of research or computing industry requirement in the body of a coherent, comprehensive and logically argued professional report.
• Utilise and justify a range of research methods to identify, select and review a wide range of fully cited information sources to support the subject matter, both historical and current.
• Identify and apply appropriate approaches, methodologies, tools and techniques that will support the progression of the subject matter and theme of a project.
• Develop well-structured solutions to an identifiable industry or requirement or support a hypothesis / intellectual argument regarding an area of research.
• Critically evaluate options and make justifiable recommendations for the subject matter.
• Critically evaluate the approach and conduct of the project.
• Demonstrate Professional conduct and adopt appropriate project management characteristics and Quality Assurance techniques
• Apply appropriate measures to address any social, professional, legal and ethical issues relating to the project work.
• Teaching Sessions 2020-2021
• Lectures take place every week throughout semester one and every two weeks in semester two. They are intended to guide you through the various stages of the project. Topics covered include:
• How to choose or propose a project
• What is a research question, what is a problem-based project?
• The detailed project proposal
• The (Compulsory) Ethics system
• Primary Research Methods
• Surveys and statistics – and why you should be wary of them
• Literature reviews
• How to obtain up to date research using the library
• Legal, Social and Ethical considerations
• Evidencing project management
• Writing up your project
• Making presentations
• Supervisor meetings
• Once you have been allocated a supervisor you will meet during the autumn term (possibly as a group). You will be expected to record the outcomes of these meetings (action points) – you will need these records to evidence your project management capabilities. In the spring term supervision meetings will occur weekly.
• The objective of this assignment is to prepare you for your final year project at Coventry University. Completing it should give you a ‘head start’ when it comes to undertaking the project. The suggested word length for the whole assignment is 2500 words (1000 for proposal elements 1500 words for literature review). Please try and remain within +/- 20% of this word length
• Please review the marking criteria before commencing work.
• Assignment Task – Develop a project proposal and initial literature review for an undergraduate project related to your degree title. Your proposal should contain the six headings described on the next page.
• Notes:
• You are expected to use the Coventry University APA style for referencing. For support and advice on this students can contact Centre for Academic Writing (CAW).
• Please notify your registry course support team and module leader for disability support.
• Any student requiring an extension or deferral should follow the university process as outlined here.
• The University cannot take responsibility for any coursework lost or corrupted on disks, laptops or personal computer. Students should therefore regularly back-up any work and are advised to save it on the University system.
• If there are technical or performance issues that prevent students submitting coursework through the online coursework submission system on the day of a coursework deadline, an appropriate extension to the coursework submission deadline will be agreed. This extension will normally be 24 hours or the next working day if the deadline falls on a Friday or over the weekend period. This will be communicated via your Module Leader.
• You are encouraged to check the originality of your work by using the draft Turnitin links on Aula.
• Collusion between students (where sections of your work are similar to the work submitted by other students in this or previous module cohorts) is taken extremely seriously and will be reported to the academic conduct panel. This applies to both coursework and exam answers.
• A marked difference between your writing style, knowledge and skill level demonstrated in class discussion, any test conditions and that demonstrated in a coursework assignment may result in you having to undertake a Viva Voce in order to prove the coursework assignment is entirely your own work.
• If you make use of the services of a proofreader in your work, you must keep your original version and make it available as a demonstration of your written efforts.
• You must not submit work for assessment that you have already submitted (partially or in full), either for your current course or for another qualification of this university, with the exception of resits, where for the coursework, you may be asked to rework and improve a previous attempt. This requirement will be specifically detailed in your assignment brief or specific course or module information. Where earlier work by you is citable, i.e. it has already been published/submitted, you must reference it clearly.  Identical pieces of work submitted concurrently may also be considered to be self-plagiarism.
• Part One
• 1Project Title
• Help: The project title is a statement based on your research question. For example, the research question ‘to what extent does a mobile application reduce the number of errors made in class registers at Coventry University in comparison to current paper-based registers’ may be stated in the project title: “A Wi-Fi driven mobile application for large group registers”.
• 2Project Topic
• Help: Describe a topic area in computing that you are personally interested in and that relates to the subject of your course. Try to be specific and identify a topic that is not so broad that you would have difficulty covering it in a one semester project module. Example 1: As a topic ‘E-Commerce’ is too broad – a more specific topic might be ‘Utilising a novel Neural Network Algorithm to improve product recommendations’. Example 2: As a topic ‘Artificial Intelligence’ is too broad – a more specific topic might be ‘detecting plagiarism in student reports utilizing data mining’. Important: Describe the outputs you expect the project to produce (a project report is taken as a given) such as demonstrator software, results from an experiment, survey results with recommendations for action, data mining outputs, a computer game level or shader method, a multimedia gallery or web framework, a demonstrator phone app, a business analysis report.
• 3Client, Audience and Motivation:
• Help: Why is this project important? To whom is this project important? A project must address a research question that generates a small piece of new knowledge. This new knowledge must be important to a named group or specific client to make it worthwhile carrying out. This is the motivation for your project. In this section you should address who will benefit from your findings and how they will benefit. (note: ‘greater knowledge about’ is defined as a benefit – even if your audience is mainly other academic researchers, new data, if collected using scientific principles, adds to the body of knowledge about the topic). A problem-based project (i.e. where you work on a solution for a ‘real world’ client or need) is obviously important to a client or user group. How are you going to evaluate whether your solution is successful?
• 4 Primary Research Plan
• Help: This is the plan as to how you will go about conducting your project – It must include a primary research method (an extended literature review is not an acceptable primary method). Think and plan logically. Primary methods may include experiments, applications or software demonstrators, process models, surveys, analysis of generated data … you may wish to suggest a timeline/Gantt Chart (covering 13 weeks) or simply a sequence of tasks. Where you intend to collect data think about how much data you need and how long the collection process will take. Make reasonable assumptions about the amount of work you can do and try not to ‘over-promise’ on results – most scientific research is small scale and time limited, this is even more the case with student projects where you also have competing modules.
• Part Two
• 5 Initial Literature Review
• Help text: Using the University Library e-journal database, the ACM portal database or Google Scholar, identify and select between three and five research papers relating to your topic. Try and identify papers that are relatively current (within the last three years). A literature review is a select analysis of existing research which is relevant to your topic. It explains and justifies how your investigation may help answer some of the questions or gaps in this area of research. A literature review is not a straightforward summary of everything you have read on the topic and it is not a chronological description of what was discovered in your field. Use your literature review to:
• Show how your study will relate to previous studies.
• Compare and contrast different authors’ views on an issue – note areas in which authors disagree.
• Highlight current exemplary studies
• Highlight any gaps in research that may provide you with a starting point for your project
• Highlight any good approaches that may allow you to develop a project idea further
• The key to the mini-literature review is your critical and evaluative perspective on the literature reviewed. Use the review to make a case/argument as to why your own research project is necessary/important.
• 6 Bibliography (key texts from your literature review)
• Help: Please provide references, in correct Harvard style, for the research papers that have informed your literature review. The references should be recent and sufficiently technical or academic. Your markers will be looking for you to identify technical reports, conference papers, journal papers, and recent textbooks. Avoid Wikipedia entries, newspaper reports that do not cite sources, and general or introductory texts.
• Student’s Name Part One: Quality and completeness of the proposal (Learning Outcomes 1 and 3)
• This Grade is awarded against the following criteria: That the research question is well formed and achievable / That the research question is specific and free from untestable generalisations / That the proposed project represents an appropriate level of challenge to a stage 6 student / That the primary method(s) proposed are appropriate and achievable and demonstrate application of a sound methodology /That the student has thought through the potential impact and audience for the project / That the primary method is described and critiqued in sufficient detail /That, taken as a whole, the proposal is clear and complete.
• Criteria/Measure <40 Not very well 40-49 Good 50- 59 Very good60-69 Excellent70+
• TOPIC Vague description of the topic. May not contextualise the project very well. A summary of the project topic that enables the reader to contextualise the research area and approach. may lack some detail A good summary of the project topic that contextualises the research area and appropriately relates to the students’ course of study. Clear outline of the problem addressed, methods used and expected outcomes. Summarises the project concisely.
• MOTIVATION AND OUTPUTS Far too general to be of much use in defining the requirements of the project. Outputs may be vague or missing. Less clear explanation of audience and less specific about needed outputs. A good description of motivation and possible outputs. May need refining further into an achievable project. Strong awareness of the client/audience and a realistic prediction of required outputs. Student can succinctly express the need for the project.
• INITIAL PROJECT PLAN Over or under ambitious. Plan is unclear or unrealistic. Constraints are not considered. An awareness of sequencing but less clear idea of time/resource allocation. Sequencing and dependencies are well described but may need refining. Constraints are identified but may not be well understood. A clear and logical sequence with awareness of the critical dependencies. Shows clear awareness of the constraints or limitations of a small-scale project.
• Sub Total /50
• Part Two: Quality of the Literature Review (Learning outcome 3)
• LITERATURE REVIEW
• Currency Lacks current information about the issues Some current information but mostly dated Demonstrates currency. Demonstrates currency and shows the state of the art of the literature
• LITERATURE REVIEW
• Critical evaluation of main literature Unfocused, disorganised and/or irrelevant No information provided that assesses the issues
• Some attempt to evaluate relevant literature Information identifying some of the issues is present but goes nowhere with it Fair review of up?to?date relevant literature Some understanding of the complexities is shown and explores some of the issues, but not in detail
• Identifies gaps or opportunities that lead to a well-defined project Demonstrates a complex understanding of the various issues involved in the subject
• LITERATURE REVIEW
• Link to research questions No link to research questions
• Leads to possible research questions but does not define them well. Reads like a general introduction to the topic Leads to focused research questions. Demonstrates understanding of relevant theory or concepts Leads to a focused research question, Considerable understanding of relevant theory or concepts
• BIBLIOGRAPHY General, lacking currency, poorly referenced. Mix of current and less relevant literature. Some mistakes in citation. Mix of relevant, mostly current, material. Properly cited using Harvard protocol. Excellent choice of current, academic, peer reviewed literature. Correctly cited using Harvard protocol.
• Sub Total /50
• Total (P1+P2) /100
• Further comments (if any):
• 303COM / 300COM Project Submission
• Final Year Project Individual Cohort : September Module Code 303COM
• Coursework Title Project: Final Report Hand out date: 02/10/2020
• Lecturer: Peter Every
• Due date: 18:00 on 16/04/21
• Estimated Time (hrs): 100
• Coursework type: Written Report % of Module MarkFinal Report: 80%
• Submission arrangements: Upload to Aula by DeadlineFile types and method of recording: PDF or Docx filesMark and Feedback date: 13/05/2021Mark and Feedback method: Written Comments (Online)
• The Turnitin link for your submission will appear on the 303COM Aula page one week before the deadline. Your submission must consist of a single report (with appendices) in MSWord or PDF format only.
• The submission file must be no greater than 20Mb in size. Please ensure your final submission file is less than 20Mb well before you upload it. If the file is larger than 20Mb this is usually caused by the inclusion of un-scaled/un-cropped high-resolution images. To correct this: 1) Try converting to PDF as this will normally rescale source images automatically or 2) Manually crop/rescale the images in your report and replace them.
• Mandatory element to be included within your report
• Please refer to the ‘report structure document’ on the Aula page for general advice about report content and structure. However, the following elements MUST be included with your report:
• A signed declaration of originality / statement of copyright / Ethical Approval project number (to be included at the start of the report).
• A clear table of contents or list of chapters
• A properly formatted list of references (Harvard style) to all external content cited or referred to in the text of your report.
• Records of supervisor meetings or project diary (in the appendix)
• Evidence of your presentation – you may discuss your response to the feedback given at the time of the presentation in your project management chapter – any other evidence of the presentation (such as notes, slides, etc., should be placed in the appendix)
• Important note: Any other content produced by your project, such as code, executables, videos, or applications should be supplied to your supervisor(s) by prior agreement. This content should not be included in the project report. Important note 2: You must keep all additional content (code, surveys, videos etc.) securely until the publication of your final project grade.
• 303COM/300COM Project Report Grading Form
• Grading Notes:
• The project report is marked out of 100. First and Second supervisors should mark the report independently. First and Second supervisors should then discuss the grading and agree a final mark. In cases where there is a significant difference of grades (over or under a grade boundary or >=10 marks – whichever is smaller) and agreement cannot be made – please contact Peter Every for allocation of a third marker.
• A final grade sheet should be prepared by the first marker including the relevant feedback from both first and second marker and the agreed final grade. This copy should be uploaded to Aula as feedback to the student.
• In all cases, feedback should clearly justify the grade awarded.
• Overleaf is a detailed component grading sheet.
• Modal grading: In awarding marks please consider the following modal guidance:
• Academic quality of the project Conduct of the project process
• >70% A report which could be, with minor modifications, suitable for publication – or form the basis for a postgraduate project.
• A project that correctly matches research methods with a well-chosen research question. OR
• A project which contains original insight or develops novel methods for the solution of a practical computing problem
• A project which has challenged the student to extend the boundaries of their own knowledge and acquire skills that they did not already possess.
• A report that is complete and very effectively communicates both the process of the project and delivers mature and pertinent conclusions. Very clear evidence of project management, time management, and consideration of social, legal, professional and ethical issues.
• Reflection on process is mature and pertinent.
• Strong evidence of reflection upon and response to supervision.
• Original use of recording and tracking methods to monitor project progress, including accounts of meetings and decision making.
• Threshold (40%) A Project with little originality that does not provide the student with sufficient challenge to demonstrate academic skills appropriate to a final year BSc degree.A project that does not demonstrate clarity of thinking.A report that suggests project conduct was chaotic, with poor project management. Completion of the report is cursory or minimal with some cohesiveness and contextualisation.
• Some account of project management and conduct but with little reflection or insight.
• Evidence that the project is rushed through some incomplete sections.
• Final Project Report Grading and Feedback
• Student name: Supervisor /Second Supervisor/final agreed feedback (delete as applicable) COMPONENT Grades
• OVERALL MEETING OF OBJECTIVES /20
• Feedback. Please comment on:
• The appropriateness of the project to the degree programme – the scope and level of challenge of the project – The degree to which the project answers the research question and meets its objectives – The degree of originality and creativity – The overall academic rigour of the project execution.
• RESEARCH METHODS & LITERATURE REVIEW WITH DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS /40
• Feedback. Please comment on:
• The suitability of the Primary Research Method(s) chosen. The execution of the primary research method.
• Literature review. The comprehensive of sources and materials used – The range, relevance and recentness of sourcing correctly cited – The level of critical appraisal of literature – The explanation of the key concepts and appropriate conclusions in relation to the project.
• Analysis of findings. The extrapolation of facts and/or statistics – The appropriateness of conclusions drawn from both primary and secondary methods. The development of novel insights or outputs. The presentation of information in a clear and comprehensive manner.
• Research – Demonstration of a wide range of reading and research for the project through analytical and reflective discussion in the dissertation. This should be supported by a varied use of in-text citation (CU Harvard Referencing or Harvard Referencing).
• CONDUCT OF PROJECT, PROJECT MANAGEMENT, DEGREE OF REFLECTION AND RESPONSE TO SUPERVISION, CONSIDERATION OF SOCIAL LEGAL AND PROFESSIONAL ISSUES. REFLECTION ON PRESENTATION /30
• Feedback. Please comment on:
• The student’s critical evaluation of project conduct – The appropriateness of methods employed to manage the project with lessons learnt and effectiveness of the experience – Evidence of project management (meeting logs / diary) – Evidence of planning and time management – The consideration of social, professional, legal and ethical issues in relation to the project.
• Evidence of a project management methodology as well as approach to the development of any website/application etc…for example: Scrum, Iterative Project Lifecycle.
• Evidence of presentation of progress to supervisor (during last two weeks of spring term) Evidence that feedback at the presentation has been captured by the student and that the report responds to and reflects on this feedback. REPORT STRUCTURE AND CLARITY OF COMMUNICATION /10
• Feedback. Please comment on:
• The clarity, conciseness and ease of use of the project report. Overall spelling, grammar, use of Harvard citation and referencing. Logical selection and ordering of chapters. The completeness and presentation of the report, appropriate use of diagrams, charts, figures etc.
• Total /100
• 300COM / 303COM Declaration of originalityI Declare that This project is all my own work and has not been copied in part or in whole from any other source except where duly acknowledged. As such, all use of previously published work (from books, journals, magazines, internet etc.) has been acknowledged by citation within the main report to an item in the References or Bibliography lists. I also agree that an electronic copy of this project may be stored and used for the purposes of plagiarism prevention and detection.
• Statement of copyright