Essay Philosophical Perspectives and Methodologies – Nursing Assignment Help

AssignmentTask:

Overview 
This assignment is a critical appraisal of two published journal articles to decide how well each article meets a previously identified information need. The two published journal articles will be

a) an original research article (primary evidence) and

b) a systematic review (secondary evidence). Having found a suitable appraisal tool for each article you will cite these tools and the articles for appraisal in a brief introduction (Part 1). Then the two critical appraisals will follow (Part 2 and Part 3). In each critical appraisal, you will discuss the clinical significance of the article and its relevance to your original question. If the appraised articles are different to those uploaded for assignment 2. the new articles must be uploaded to the relevant portals on Blackboard before submitting Assignment 3.

Learning outcomes

This assessment task is aligned to the following Unit learning outcomes. 
• demonstrate an understanding of the main health research philosophical perspectives and methodologies including their assumptions and practical applications 
• distinguish between different evidence types and research designs 
• critically appraise primary and secondary evidence to answer relevant structured questions. 
Assessment details Assignment 3 is a critical appraisal of 
a) an original research article (primary evidence) and of 
b) a systematic review (secondary evidence) to decide how well each article meets your information need. Your assignment should be written and structured according to the details below. To complete Assignment 3 you will need to 
a) Use the question/s, and the best item of primary evidence and the systematic review found for Assignment 2 OR Write alternative question/s and find an alternative item of primary evidence and/or systematic review 
b) Ensure the full PDF of the primary evidence being appraised in Assignment 3 has been uploaded to the relevant Assignment 2 portal: CHECK again, is it really original research?