Assignment Task:
The purpose of this assessment is for you to demonstrate your understanding of research methods by completing a critique of published literature. You will be required to critique two research articles which have been chosen by the module team. One paper will involve qualitative methods and one paper quantitative methods. The titles of research articles will be released on Blackboard Learn in the folder titled Assessment Information. Your critique essay should be up to 2000 words long and should not exceed this word limit. The mark awarded for this essay constitutes 100% of the overall module grade. Guidance for the critique The quantitative research paper you are being asked to critically appraise is: Rose, A., Birch, I., Kuisma, R. (2011) ‘Effect of motion control running shoes compared with neutral shoes on tibial rotation during running.’ Physiotherapy, 97, pp. 250–255 The qualitative paper you are being asked to critically appraise is: Sharma, H., Bulley, C., van Wijck, F. (2012) ‘Experiences of an exercise referral scheme from the perspective of people with chronic stroke: a qualitative study.’ Physiotherapy, 98, pp. 336–343 For each paper identify and discuss 3 aspects of the study that you think represent either a strength or a limitation of the study and explain why you think that is so. These could include anything from whether the research question is well explained and justified, whether the overall design is appropriate for the question, how specific aspects of the design or conduct of the study might impact on validity (internal or external), coherence or rigour, the approach taken to analysing data or whether the way that the authors of the paper present and interpret the results is fair and balanced. For both papers at least one of those 3 aspects must relate to the choice of data analysis or the actual results section. You should structure your critique in the following manner: Write it in 2 distinct sections of around 1000 words each. Each section should focus on one of the papers. The text should read like a fully developed narrative. Bullet point lists are not acceptable. This is an exercise in academic writing and constructing critical arguments/ explanations. For each section follow this format Introduction. Open with a short section that describes the paper, its topic area and the research question it seeks to answer. Offer some brief context. Main body of the critique. Identify 3 features from each paper that you think represent either strengths or limitations. For each of these features justify your answers by explaining how these features have impacted the study or affect our confidence in the conclusions. In this you will need to show your knowledge of the relevant research methods. Conclusion. This section should offer a concise and balanced summary of what you have presented in the main body of the critique. It should summarise the main points that you have made. You should not be presenting new information here; if something is important, it should have been mentioned in the main body of the critique. Wordage. Your essay should be up to 2000 words long with no allowance for extra words. Your submission may be less than the maximum wordage. If you exceed the upper word limit, the excess part of your critique will not be read or marked. All content (except for any tables, charts and references within brackets in the main body of the text) between the title and reference list is included in the word count.
Welcome to Our Online Academic Writing Service. Our online assignment writing website provide various guarantees that will never be broken. No matter whether you need a narrative essay, 5-paragraph essay, persuasive essay, descriptive essay, or expository essay, we will provide you with quality papers at student friendly price.
Need Help Writing an Essay?
Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper.
Get Help Now!Ask for Instant Writing Help. No Plagiarism Guarantee!
