Essay Critical Evaluation of a Scientific Paper – Management Assignment Help

Assignment Task:

Task:

Why are reviews necessary

• Advice to journal editors – do the papers have scientific merit?

• Science should stand up to critical assessment before publication

• Peer reviewed publications vs preprints (eg Bioarchives – bioRxiv)

• Confidence to the readers

• accuracy and interpretation of the data

• papers should have no obvious scientific flaws (no fake news stories?)

• Any weaknesses addressed directly in the Discussion Reviewer reports to the journal editor How novel, or relevant, is the study to the current literature Has this work, or very similar work, been published before? Has the work been performed in an ethical manner?

Has sufficient detail been given in M&M to reproduce results? Have the appropriate, or relevant, controls been used?

Have the correct interpretations been made?

Have the figures been appropriately labelled and explained Have the findings been appropriately discussed in terms of the current literature?

Any typos / grammatical errors? (Sloppy writing =sloppy science

Assignment 2

• Task: Write a critical review of a given scientific paper with introduced flaws

• Write like you are reviewing a scientific paper, and giving advice to the editor about whether the paper has scientific merit and is acceptable for the journal

• Give balance to your criticisms